| From schoberlaw.com Newsletter Sarbanes-Oxley Implications for Privately Held Companies April, 2005 by: Thomas G. Schober
The collapse of dozens of major U.S. Corporations over the past decade has resulted in a significant federal response to satisfy shareholders and the public that investments in such companies would not be lost through fraud. The most major piece of legislation is the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), which provides new regulation and even criminal sanctions. While aimed at major companies, some of the SOX provisions apply to privately held companies as well. Those provisions primarily applicable to privately held companies include:
Why should companies consider complying with SOX, even if not required by federal law? If a company plans to grow, such that it may become the target for a takeover by a SOX compliance-required company, it would make the takeover go more quickly and at a lower cost. Securing money from lenders may be easier. States are likely to enact similar legislation that will apply to a broader group of companies, so compliance may be necessary anyway. So what should the prudent, privately held company do? It is probably best to:
What things make sense, in any event, whether you want to comply with SOX or not?
If you are interested in implementing such a plan, we can be of assistance to you. © Copyright 2003 by Schober Schober and Mitchell, S.C., Phone 262-785-1820 |